文章摘要
汤晨,钟君,胡德英,王小姣,周培,陈涵彬,王静怡,王蓓.终末期患者谵妄相关痛苦程度量表的汉化及信效度研究[J]同济医院杂志社,2026,41(5):31-34+40
终末期患者谵妄相关痛苦程度量表的汉化及信效度研究
Translation and reliability and validity evaluation of the Terminal Delirium-Related Distress Scale
投稿时间:2025-10-10  修订日期:2025-12-24
DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2026.05.031
中文关键词: 癌症患者;家属;终末期;谵妄;痛苦;量表;临终关怀;肿瘤护理
英文关键词: cancer patients;family member;terminal stage;delirium;distress;scale;hospice care;oncology nursing
基金项目:科研项目:武汉大学中南医院临床护理研究项目(LCHLYJ202305)
汤晨,钟君,胡德英,王小姣,周培,陈涵彬,王静怡,王蓓
武汉大学中南医院胃肠外科(湖北 武汉,430071)
;华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院肿瘤中心护理部;武汉大学中南医院关节与运动科;武汉大学中南医院护理部
摘要点击次数: 4
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 对终末期患者谵妄痛苦程度量表进行汉化,并检验其信效度,为从患者家属角度测量终末期患者谵妄痛苦程度提供工具。 方法 根据Brislin模型对英文版量表进行正译、回译及文化调适。选取333名死亡谵妄患者的家属进行问卷调查,验证量表的信度和效度。 结果 最终形成的中文版量表包括患者痛苦、与患者沟通、医护人员的支持与理解以及临终安宁4个维度,共16个条目。4个公因子累计方差贡献率为63.366%;验证性因子分析结果显示χ2/df=3.616,RMSEA=0.100,IFI=0.886,CFI=0.885,TLI=0.848。中文版量表的Cronbach′s α系数为0.766,内容效度指数S-CVI/UA为0.834。 结论 中文版终末期患者谵妄相关痛苦程度量表信度和效度可接受,可用于终末期谵妄患者的痛苦程度测量。
英文摘要:
      Objective To translate the Terminal Delirium-Related Distress Scale (TDDS) into Chinese and examine its reliability and validity, and to provide a reliable tool for assessing patient distress due to terminal delirium from the perspective of family members. Methods Following the Brislin′s translation model, forward-translation, back-translation, and cultural adaptation were perform to generate the Chinese version of the TDDS.A total of 333 family members of deceased patients who experienced delirium were surveyed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The final Chinese version of the TDDS comprised 16 items across four dimensions: patient distress, communicate with the patient, support and understanding from healthcare staff, and end-of-life comfort.The four common factors accounted for 63.366% of the cumulative variance.Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit (χ2/df=3.616, RMSEA=0.100, IFI=0.886, CFI=0.885, and TLI=0.848).The Cronbach′s α coefficient for the scale was 0.766.The scale-level content validity index using average method (S-CVI/UA) was 0.834. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the TDDS are acceptable, and can be used to assess delirium-related distress in terminal patients.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭